In 1998 recommendations on the management of AF were reported by the Working Group of Arrhythmias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Whether multiplication of guidelines and differences in recommendation impact their implementation in clinical practice, remains to be assessed.Ītrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice and may be associated with symptoms, haemodynamic impairment and frightening embolic complications. Use of new anticoagulants and of new antiarrhythmic drug therapy is also discussed in the light of recent trial results. Significant differences were found between guidelines in the quality of evidence or level of evidence and on the strength of recommendations. long-term rate control strategy, long-term rhythm control strategy, oral anticoagulation and AF catheter ablation). We reviewed these three sets of AF guidelines and compared their rating systems and their recommendations regarding four major AF management aspects (i.e. Focused updates have also appeared more recently. In 2010 new guidelines on AF were published by the ESC, and in 2011 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF)/AHA/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and by the Canadian Cardiac Society (CCS). The American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA) and the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) reported joint guidelines on atrial fibrillation (AF) in 2001 and a revised version in 2006.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |